[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Recent Google announcements
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Recent Google announcements
- From: Brian Elkins <brianelkins@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 17:03:43 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
>From Google's own examples it appears at this point in the planning stage that copyrighted works submitted will not show which libraries hold the item http://print.google.com/googleprint/about_example.html only public domain works will show availability in local libraries (Google has OCLC's WorldCat database for their use also). It would be nice if publisher submitted works also showed libray availability. Brian Elkins On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 14:51:48 EST, Joseph Esposito <espositoj@gmail.com> wrote: > I would be interested to know what people are thinking about the recent > Google announcements (Google Scholar, Google Print, etc.) and their > impact on the business of academic librarianship. If there were a list > called "the meaning of Google," I would like to be on it. Speculation > appears to be all over the place (what exactly is Google planning to do? > How will this fit into emerging metadata schemes? Will Google become > the "universal interface" for all research? Is metasearch dead? Will > enabling data harvesting by Google become a priority for publishers, and > if so, how wiil this affect the libraries that license content?). > There appears to be a great deal to learn about this. As they say at > Starbucks, make it a vente. > > Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: copyright and licensing: two quick comments and a question
- Next by Date: Partial response to Peter Banks
- Previous by thread: RE: Recent Google Announcements
- Next by thread: Indexing services including more fulltext
- Index(es):