[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SPAM-LOW: RE: Question regarding ILL
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: SPAM-LOW: RE: Question regarding ILL
- From: Joseph Esposito <espositoj@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 18:16:38 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I'm afraid I don't understand what Sally means by "a standard interface 'module'." Perhaps she could elaborate? Joe Esposito On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 14:23:38 EST, Sally Morris (ALPSP) <chief-exec@alpsp.org> wrote: > I have for some time thought that it would make a huge difference to the > easy, 'seamless' acquisition of documents, if everyone in the information > chain could be persuaded to adopt a standard interface 'module', if you > like. > > Essentially, for any given document, there is a limited number of options: > > 1) It is freely accessible to all > 2) It is not freely accessible to all but: > a) You have access rights to it > b) You can purchase it at price 'x' > c) You cannot access it at any price (!) > > I really wish someone would develop such a module. Any takers out there? > > Sally Morris, Chief Executive > Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers > E-mail: chief-exec@alpsp.org
- Next by Date: Re: ILL's, licensing, and the French Revolution
- Next by thread: Re: ILL's, licensing, and the French Revolution
- Index(es):