[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Question regarding ILL
- To: "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu'" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Question regarding ILL
- From: "Stuivenga, Will" <wstuivenga@secstate.wa.gov>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 20:01:41 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
The answer is that a license agreement is a form of a contract. If you sign a contract that prohibits you from doing something that is otherwise legal, you've just given up that right by contract. Contracts supersede the law in this regard. Unfortunately, (in my opinion) courts have upheld even click through or shrink wrap licenses more often than they should. Will Stuivenga <wstuivenga@secstate.wa.gov> Project Manager, Statewide Database Licensing (SDL) Washington State Library Division, Office of the Secretary of State 360.704.5217 fax: 360.586.7575 http://www.statelib.wa.gov/library/libraries/projects/sdl/ -----Original Message----- From: Rich Dodenhoff [mailto:rdodenhoff@aspet.org] Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 2:14 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: RE: Question regarding ILL Maybe I'm just na�ve, but if ILL is allowed under U.S. Copyright Law, how can publishers refuse to allow libraries in the U.S. to provide ILL? It's guaranteed under the law. Doesn't that make the barring of ILL illegal? Richard Dodenhoff Journals Director American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 9650 Rockville Pike Bethesda, MD 20814-3995 301.634.7997 (p) / 301.634.7061 (f)
- Prev by Date: Re: Question regarding ILL
- Next by Date: RE: Question regarding ILL
- Previous by thread: Re: Question regarding ILL
- Next by thread: RE: Question regarding ILL
- Index(es):