[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OA needs its own list
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: OA needs its own list
- From: "Anthony Watkinson" <anthony.watkinson@btopenworld.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 18:08:18 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I sympathise with what Will writes. I work part-time as a real publisher and for me OA considerations do not loom large in my day to day activities in that role. Just occasionally an academic now mentions OA but in the hope that the whole thing will go away - honestly! I of course exaggerate, but not much. However the great advantage of any discussion on this list is that it is broad church. The lists Peter Suber mentions are I think all in this category though representing different schools of OA advocates. This list is moderated in a neutral and humane way so that we are spared repeated advocacy from some of those who go in for repeated advocacy. Discussion on the lists that Bernie mentions are discussions about how OA can be achieved, which is different from discussion about OA. Please Will let us continue to use and learn from this wonderful forum. Anthony
- Prev by Date: Re: OA needs its own list
- Next by Date: RE: OA needs its own list
- Previous by thread: Re: OA needs its own list
- Next by thread: RE: OA needs its own list
- Index(es):