[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Calculating the Cost : an author rejoinder
- To: <pmd8@cornell.edu>, <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Calculating the Cost : an author rejoinder
- From: "Peter Banks" <pbanks@diabetes.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 19:44:56 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
In a bracingly insulting way, Phil raises some important issues. To me, a largely unexamined question is "What is the role of government in scholarship and in the dissemination of ideas?" Only Pat Schroeder of AAP has discussed this in any depth (not surprisingly, given her long-standing concern with the politization of science). It is rather extraordinary to me that so little of the discussion of OA has addressed the increased role of the government in the dissemination of ideas through scholarly publishing. Were students of media law and the history of journalism involved in this debate (as they should be, probably), they would likely instantly point out the danger of putting the government in charge of the dissemination of critical ideas. There seems to be an assumption among many OA advocates that a producer pays model (which is, in many cases, a government pays model, since authors fees are paid for with government funds) leads to a freer flow of ideas and information. You only have to look at the conduct of this extremely secretive administration to question whether politicians can ever be trusted to safeguard scientific dialogue. Are we really content, knowing how funding for controversial areas can dry up in the political wind, to empower the government to decide whether to allow grantees to use grant funds to publish papers in areas like bioweapons, contraception, family planning, stem cell research, or many other controversial topics? The US has a strong legal tradition against any sort of prior restraint dating back to the 1931 case Near v. Minnesota. We should be very, very careful before undermining one of the most important safeguards to free expression we have--that tradition against any form a prior restraint, which survived even the Pentagon Papers case. Peter Banks Publisher American Diabetes Association 1701 North Beauregard Street Alexandria, VA 22311 703/299-2033 FAX 703/683-2890 Email: pbanks@diabetes.org
- Prev by Date: Workshop reminder -- Tips for Negotiating Electronic Licenses
- Next by Date: Calculating the cost: inspired by the author's rejoinder
- Previous by thread: Re: Calculating the Cost : an author rejoinder
- Next by thread: Fwd: Calculating the Cost : an author rejoinder
- Index(es):