[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Alternative Peer Review Models
- To: <adam.hodgkin@gmail.com>
- Subject: Alternative Peer Review Models
- From: "Gerry Mckiernan" <gerrymck@iastate.edu>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:19:20 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Adam: I review a variety of alternatives to conventional peer review in an article published last year titled: "Peer Review in the Internet Age: Five (5) Easy Pieces," _Against the Grain_ 16, no. 3 (June 2004): 50, 52-55 A self-archived PDF copy is available at [ http://www.public.iastate.edu/~gerrymck/FiveEasyPieces.pdf ] Enjoy! /Gerry Gerry McKiernan Associate Professor and Science and Technology Librarian and Bibliographer Iowa State University Library Ames IA 50011 gerrymck@iastate.edu >>> adam.hodgkin@gmail.com 1/5/2005 5:12:38 PM >>> [snip] >For example: do we really need a 'market-led' method of quality control >(refereeing through Society and privately funded journals) or would it be >preferable to use an automated system of peer review, entirely within the >control of academic researchers? [snip]
- Prev by Date: Re: Calculating the Cost per Article in the Current Subscription Model
- Next by Date: Oxford Journals Schizophrenia Bulletin Press Release
- Previous by thread: RE: Calculating the Cost per Article in the Current Subscription Model
- Next by thread: Oxford Journals Schizophrenia Bulletin Press Release
- Index(es):