[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fascinating quotation
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Fascinating quotation
- From: Joseph Esposito <espositoj@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:47:15 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I respectfully disagree with Sally's comment. The costs will rise, not remain the same or decline. They will rise because the amount of research continues to grow and because one aspect of the proprietary publishing system (publishers reject manuscripts, keeping the amount of published work down) will erode, with more and more authors seeking new ways to reach an audience. There are many strong arguments in favor of Open Access publishing, but restraining costs is not among them. Joe Esposito On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 22:10:24 EST, Sally Morris (ALPSP) <chief-exec@alpsp.org> wrote: > The costs which need to be recovered are the same, whether this is done > through author charges or explicit (or implicit) subsidy. It makes no > difference. > > Sally Morris, Chief Executive > Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers > E-mail: chief-exec@alpsp.org
- Prev by Date: January issue of the SPARC Open Access Newsletter
- Next by Date: Re: Money for OA; was, RE: fascinating question
- Previous by thread: Re: Fascinating quotation
- Next by thread: RE: Critique of J-C Guedon's Serials Review article on Open Access
- Index(es):