[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fascinating quotation
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Fascinating quotation
- From: "Sally Morris \(ALPSP\)" <chief-exec@alpsp.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 23:44:22 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I tend to agree with David that OA could - in principle - appeal to many publishers, as it satisfies their and their authors' aim of reaching the maximum target readership. However, there are some big questions to be answered: What does the publication (or submission + publication) charge need to be, for the journal to remain viable and to satisfy whatever the profit/surplus needs of the parent organisation may be? Do authors have access to sufficient funds to cover that charge? Only if the answer to the second question is yes, will OA succeed. If the answer is no, it will destroy journals (and potentially, societies too - unlike commercial publishers, they don't have the option to get out and do something different) That is why we are carrying out our major research project (with AAAS and HighWire) to try to obtain some concrete information, which is singularly lacking at present Sally Morris, Chief Executive Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers E-mail: chief-exec@alpsp.org
- Prev by Date: Re: libraries and licensing of personal database subscriptions
- Next by Date: Re: libraries and licensing of personal database subscriptions
- Previous by thread: RE: Fascinating quotation
- Next by thread: RE: Fascinating quotation
- Index(es):