[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Fascinating quotation
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Fascinating quotation
- From: "T Scott Plutchak" <tscott@uab.edu>
- Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 00:30:05 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I don't think Mark suggested that "medical libraries never discontinue periodicals." As he has emphasized, he is speaking strictly about the potential impact of the NIH proposal on medical libraries' possible cancellations. Medical libraries will discontinue periodicals for many reasons. However, the point that I believe that Mark was making is that it is extremely unlikely that the NIH proposal itself will create a condition that will lead to cancellations. David's hypotheticals don't apply. Few, if any, biomedical periodicals publish 90% NIH-funded work; and there is little, if any, NIH-funded work in the philosophy journals. It is quite possible that the various open access experiments will lead to conditions that will cause biomedical libraries to cancel subscriptions. The NIH proposal, in its current form, is not one of them. T. Scott Plutchak Director, Lister Hill Library of the Health Sciences University of Alabama at Birmingham tscott@uab.edu
- Prev by Date: RE: Fascinating quotation
- Next by Date: BBC Radio 4: Publish or be damned
- Previous by thread: RE: Fascinating quotation
- Next by thread: Re: Fascinating quotation
- Index(es):