[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
patientINFORM that stole Chrismas
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: patientINFORM that stole Chrismas
- From: Richard Feinman <RFeinman@downstate.edu>
- Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 17:57:35 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
What's wrong with patientINFORM, is that it will not only restrict the disease states that are covered but also particular papers that it deems unimportant and will thereby 1. decide which papers are too be most widely circulated not only to patients but to other researchers. This, in some sense, bypasses peer review. 2. deciding which papers are widely available might be considered an abuse of their copyrights which is just why they may not be the best people to be holders of copyrights. 3. make some health organizations de facto advocacy groups rather than information groups. There is already some question about this. These may be men of good will but it is unlikely that patientINFORM will bring us much peace. _________ Sent by: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: Supporters of NIH Policy See Publishers' Gambit as Possible Diversion Dear liblicense-l readers: I was disappointed by the press release issued last Thursday by "Supporters of the NIH Policy" with regard to the patientINFORM program being launched by a number of publishers. Surely there is much to appreciate and welcome about this new resource; if it has defects, then surely we should comment in a way that respects its virtues. The project doesn't appear to claim to be a replacement for all biomedical articles from specialist journals but rather aims for a readable site that can help the general population to understand some of the most serious of today's diseases and illnesses. While it can't address all of them at once, cancer, heart disease and diabetes make for a good start. Not every discourse needs to be about Open Access business models; not all projects and announcements need to be pricing negotations. In the spirit of Christmas and New Year's resolutions, could we all think -- as one of this list's subscribers wrote privately -- about solving problems rather than needing to be right? Sincerely, Ann Okerson/liblicense-l moderator (please don't shoot, at least not till after the holiday break)
- Prev by Date: Canadian copyright forum: licensing the Internet?
- Next by Date: Important Announcement from the Harvard Libraries
- Previous by thread: Canadian copyright forum: licensing the Internet?
- Next by thread: Important Announcement from the Harvard Libraries
- Index(es):