[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Critique of APS Critique of NIH Proposal
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: Critique of APS Critique of NIH Proposal
- From: "Klein, Bonnie" <BKlein@DTIC.MIL>
- Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 17:19:12 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Overall, Steve Harnard's comments are on point. See Goverment Accountability Report, University Research: Most Federal Agencies Need to Better Protect Against Financial Conflicts of Interest. GAO-04-31 November 14, 2003. http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d0431.pdf. The report begins with a discussion of how government funded grant research is made publicly available. What GAO Found: Each of the eight federal agencies GAO examined relies on university scientists who receive federally funded research grants to make the results available to the public. Although university scientists customarily seek to publish their research results in peer-reviewed journals, agencies cannot require such publication as a condition for funding because it is impossible to ensure in advance that the results will be accepted for publication. Agencies do, however, explicitly encourage funding recipients to make results public. The Departments of Agriculture, Defense, and Energy; the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) also disseminate the results of their funded research by posting them on their Web sites. Officials from these agencies said that posting the results is an effective way to share information among scientists, as well as with the public. In contrast, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Science Foundation (NSF) do not post research results on their Web sites. According to NIH officials, the risk associated with posting researchers' final reports before they have been validated by peer review is too great in the biomedical field. The Department of Education is considering how best to widely disseminate the results of research it funds. Agency grant assistance agreements (note the operative term "agreements") generally include a number of provisions and conditions. Agencies have the prerogative and flexibility to change these terms. Agencies that disseminate the results of grant work do so to foster technology transition, the advancement of science and provide for open public accountability. Regarding the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)Program, SBA is responsible for overall policy. However, agencies develop their own implementation plans. Also note SBIR is not a grant program. See CENDI Frequently Asked Questions About Copyright 4.2 Are Data Rights Any Different Under Special Programs Such as the Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) Program? http://www.cendi.gov/publications/04-8copyright.html#42. For additional insights, you might look at the entire FAQ Section 4: Works Created Under a Federal Contract or Grant. The FAQ itself is a "work of the U.S. Government (Title 17 USC 105). CENDI agencies fund 92% of all government research and have long maintained institutional repositories. Bonnie Klein Chair, CENDI Copyright Working Group
- Prev by Date: FW: Federal Plan to Keep Data on Students Worries Some
- Next by Date: Licensing Principles Questions
- Previous by thread: Fwd: Critique of APS Critique of NIH Proposal
- Next by thread: Re: Critique of APS Critique of NIH Proposal
- Index(es):