[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Load balancing
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Load balancing
- From: Phil Davis <pmd8@cornell.edu>
- Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:26:29 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
At 04:15 PM 11/21/2004 -0500, you wrote: >It is standard practice to ask authors to certify that the paper has not >simultaneously been submitted to any other journal. > >Sally Morris, Chief Executive >Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers >E-mail: chief-exec@alpsp.org Sally, Many publishers have policies to prevent multiple submissions by the author and Emerald is no exception. Emerald's submission policy assumes that the content is original and that ownership of the content is transferred from the author to the publisher. Ex. "Articles submitted to the journal should be original contributions and should not be under consideration for any other publication at the same time. Authors submitting articles for publication warrant that the work is not an infringement of any existing copyright and will indemnify the publisher against any breach of such warranty. For ease of dissemination and to ensure proper policing of use, papers and contributions become the legal copyright of the publisher unless otherwise agreed. Submissions should be submitted by e-mail or on disk to:" -- ASLIB PROCEEDINGS: NEW INFORMATION PERSPECTIVES, Notes for Contributors In addition, the copyright policy of Emerald is designed to: "Protect authors' moral rights and their work from plagiarism, unlawful copying and any other infringement of copyright." Please note that the publisher's policies are set to protect the company against unethical and illegal acts performed by the author such as multiple submissions. They do not state guidelines for what is acceptable behavior once copyright permissions are transferred to the publisher. --Phil Davis
- Prev by Date: Re: Load balancing
- Next by Date: RE: Critique of STM Critique of NIH Proposal
- Previous by thread: Re: Load balancing
- Next by thread: Re: Load balancing
- Index(es):