[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: scholar.google vs Scirus
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: scholar.google vs Scirus
- From: John Sack <sack@stanford.edu>
- Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 16:22:40 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I looked at the comparison pointed to below at the Elsevier site, and it
seems to be a comparison of Scirus and the "standard" Google search, not
Google Scholar. They are different, so the comparison would need to be
re-done, I'd think.
The comparison page even says "So you won't end up in a Tennessee
attraction park after entering 'Dolly'," which suggests it is using the
broad google search. That is, I did a search for "dolly" on
scholar.google.com and didn't see anything particularly amusing, park or
otherwise...:) but the amusement park ("Dollywood.com") is #3 in general
google.
John Sack
Director, HighWire Press
Stanford University
sack@stanford.edu
-------------------
--On Friday, November 19, 2004 12:17 PM -0500 Anna Ercoli Schnitzer <schnitzr@umich.edu> wrote:
Try this test comparing Google Scholar and Scirus: http://www.extranet.elsevier.com/listman/scirus/nov04/google%20online.htm Anna Ercoli Schnitzer schnitzr@umich.edu "Sloan, Bernie" wrote:Here's an overview of "Google Scholar" from some librarians (Shirl Kennedy and Gary Price): http://www.resourceshelf.com/2004/11/wow-its-google-scholar.html Bernie Sloan
- Prev by Date: Re: Load balancing
- Next by Date: Re: Load balancing
- Previous by thread: Re: scholar.google vs Scirus
- Next by thread: For Immediate Release: CQ Press announces first Online Edition e-book featuring Historic Documents series
- Index(es):