[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Copyright in China
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu, Joseph Esposito <espositoj@gmail.com>
- Subject: Re: Copyright in China
- From: jcg <jean.claude.guedon@umontreal.ca>
- Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 19:43:27 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Alas, the answer I gave back on October 25th does not seem to have been taken into account by Joseph Esposito. Yet, I did address the question of integrity head on, or so I believe. Is there anything wrong with my answer? If so, what? Best, Jean-Claude Gu�don On Sat October 30 2004 10:21 pm, Joseph Esposito wrote: > Alas, the summary of what I was saying is not what I was saying. Of > course piracy is irrelevant in an OA environment--of course. But changing > the text is relevant. My question is how is the integrity of the text > going to be managed. I am NOT saying that only a commercial publisher can > do this; I am saying that someone has to do it. As for the quality of > commercial publishers, it's all over the place, as everybody knows. The > successful not-for-profit publishers (e.g., Oxford University Press, to > choose an unarguable example) are outstanding at what they do. > > Let's agree to disagree, but let's not agree to summarize each other's > views inaccurately. Heck, that was the point of my first post, that the > Chinese done Bill Clinton wrong. > > Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: RE: Any licensing seminars coming up soon?
- Next by Date: Comments to NIH Director Dr. Zerhouni by DC Principles Signatories
- Previous by thread: RE: Any licensing seminars coming up soon?
- Next by thread: Comments to NIH Director Dr. Zerhouni by DC Principles Signatories
- Index(es):