[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Copyright in China
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Copyright in China
- From: Heather Morrison <heatherm@eln.bc.ca>
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 22:29:05 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
As for the book, I haven't seen it, and so cannot say whether this particular item is parody or bootleg. Joe, your assumption seems to be that it will be necessary to protect documents against piracy, and that this will be more important with open access. This simply does not make any sense. When the information is free, there is no incentive for piracy. You are also implying that quality requires production in a commercial environment. From my viewpoint, there is no correlation between quality of work and production by a commercial entity. A great deal of scholarly publishing is done by nonprofit societies and/or or university presses, both of which are known for the quality of their work. The commercial sector does produce quality published materials; it also produces sensational tabloids. To sum: quality information can be produced by either the nonprofit or the commercial sector. The commercial sector can produce information of either high or low quality. Therefore, there is no correlation between quality of information and commercial publishing. This is not to say there is no role for the commercial sector in the open access environment; of course there is. BioMedCentral is both a commercial entity and a leader in the Open Access movement. If there is a contest for ludicrous arguments against open access, I'd like to nominate this one! best, Heather Morrison On 27-Oct-04, at 7:07 PM, Joseph Esposito wrote:
I do not read Chinese, but based on the article in the NY Times and my own experience with bootlegs in Asia, I doubt this was a parody. Our experience many years ago at Encyclopaedia Britannica in doing even an authorized translation into Chinese was a doozy. As for the comment that "it should not be difficult to design systems to ensure and compare the integrity of documents," I wonder who is going to do all this easy work, when they will do it, and on whose budget. I am not saying that the work is hard and that it won't be done; I just want to know how it is all going to happen. The related question is who is going to organize this work, how it will be managed, and to whom the management is held accountable. In other words, all the things one takes for granted in a commercial environment. Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: Post-cancellation arrangements and ScienceDirect
- Next by Date: RE: Post-cancellation arrangements and ScienceDirect
- Previous by thread: Re: Copyright in China
- Next by thread: Re: Copyright in China
- Index(es):