[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Citation databases and open access journals
- To: "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu'" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Citation databases and open access journals
- From: "Pringle, James" <james.pringle@thomson.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 18:13:33 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Questions have arisen on this list about coverage of open access journals in the Web of Science(r). We have good news to report. Thomson Scientific evaluates journals for coverage in its Thomson ISI(r) citation databases according to clearly defined selection criteria (See http://www.isinet.com/essays/selectionofmaterialforcoverage/199701.html/ ). This is in line with our mission of helping researchers find the best and most relevant scholarly content for their research. Our evaluation criteria are the same for all journals, regardless of the business model under which they are published and the access model under which they are distributed. As of June 30, 2004, we found a combined, deduplicated total of 1190 Open Access journals listed in the DOAJ, SciELO, and J-STAGE directories. Of these, 239, or about 20%, are currently included in the ISI citation databases, and can be searched in the Web of Science. These titles include PLOS Biology and a number of BioMed Central journals. Within the next couple of weeks, we will be posting a full study of these 239 journals on the Thomson ISI web site ( <http://www.isinet.com/> http://www.isinet.com/). This study will update an earlier analysis, from February of this year, which found 192 open access journals in our databases at that time. Jim Pringle Vice President, Development, Thomson/ISI -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Sent: Wed Oct 20 22:09:38 2004 Subject: RE: Citation databases and open access journals Heather, I agree with you. What I am hoping for in the meantime is journals born digital will continue to be included in aggregators and eventually into the WoS until we all figure out research impact of these OA journals. An example is BE Press, whereby it is aggregated in EBSCO, but we still buy it because we can own it, not just rental. I've not understood through on receiving messages for many months as a subscriber on ICOLC's or this listserve in resolving who owns the content if an institution pays the fee to be published, if it's from the library end or the researcher's end, depending who pays. Regards, Becky Smith, Head of the Business & Economics and Labor Libraries UIUC
- Prev by Date: RE: Copyright in China
- Next by Date: Elsevier and SELL
- Previous by thread: RE: Citation databases and open access journals
- Next by thread: Elsevier and SELL
- Index(es):