[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Springer blasts Open Choice criticism
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Springer blasts Open Choice criticism
- From: "T Scott Plutchak" <tscott@uab.edu>
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:52:33 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Heather suggests that a "well-managed" high-end journal could put out 24 issues, with 720 articles, with the services of one full-time editor and one full-time editorial assistant. I think that's a stretch. The Journal of the Medical Library Assocation qualifies, I think, as a small speciality journal (four issues per year, 50-60 articles). We have one editorial assistant, who handles all MLA publications. She spends a minimum of 6 hours on each article that we publish -- that's final formatting, line-editing and proofreading before sending to the printer. It does not count checking the proofs that come back from the printer, and making corrections (we do three rounds of printers' proofs). If we published 720 articles per year that would require a minimum of 4,320 hours, or a little over two full-time equivalents. I spend about the same amount of time per article as editor -- that involves collating the reviewers comments, writing my own critiques to go back to the authors and then working with the authors on revisions. It does not include the two to three hours each that I spend on articles that we reject. Typesetting, and prepartions of .pdf and .xml are all contracted out, so of course there's a cost there. We save hosting costs, since our only electronic version appears on PubMed Central. Then there are the printing and distribution costs, which would, of course, be eliminated if we went electronic only. Based on my own experience, then, I don't see how a journal could put out 720 articles per year in 24 issues with only a single editor and editorial assistant, particularly if the journal had a fairly high rejection rate. As it happens, the budget for the JMLA is about $160,000 per year -- that's direct costs that are contracted out, plus the portion of the editorial assistant's and director of publication's time that is assigned to the JMLA. It does not take into account my time since I, like my predecessors, am a lunatic volunteer. Scott T. Scott Plutchak Editor, Journal of the Medical Library Association Director, Lister Hill Library of the Health Sciences University of Alabama at Birmingham tscott@uab.edu
- Prev by Date: ALPSP and SSP Joint Seminar In Washington DC - Open Access: does itreally work in practice?
- Next by Date: AALL ACTION ALERT: Stop the INDUCE Act--Mark-up Sept. 30th
- Previous by thread: Re: Springer blasts Open Choice criticism
- Next by thread: 2005 Journal News from Blackwell Publishing
- Index(es):