[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Springer blasts Open Choice criticism-- Concensus
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>, <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>, <chief-exec@alpsp.org>, <heatherm@eln.bc.ca>
- Subject: RE: Springer blasts Open Choice criticism-- Concensus
- From: "David Goodman" <David.Goodman@liu.edu>
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:20:45 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Dear Heather, My figure was not an estimate of costs, but merely an indication of where I think the general consensus lies based on postings, published articles and reports, and ignoring statements in newspapers and oral testimony. I do not consider myself qualified to estimate publishing costs. I do not have detailed data from a single publisher, let alone the industry as a whole. For accuracy, I would need not merely detailed but audited data: I know of none. My experience and training do not in any case qualify me to judge publishers' cost accounting, though I am always interested when publishers present even fragments. I do consider myself qualified to understand what apparently reliable public sources say, and summarize and report what I find. That is all that I did, and all that I am able to do. To step outside my qualifications for a moment, I would regard any of a wide range of costs as potentially valid, given the different bases for the accounting and the different publications. I do not regard the views of Heather and those of Sally as necessarily incompatible. Dr. David Goodman Associate Professor Palmer School of Library and Information Science Long Island University dgoodman@liu.edu -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu on behalf of heatherm@eln.bc.ca Sent: Tue 9/28/2004 8:25 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu; David Goodman; chief-exec@alpsp.org; heatherm@eln.bc.ca Subject: Re: Springer blasts Open Choice criticism This is in reply to two messages from Sally: I would like to repeat that the ICAAP cost of $3,000 Cdn ($2,300 U.S.) per journal helps to set the right frame for discussion about what the right ballpark costs for journal production might be in the future. David Goodman's estimate of $1,500 - $3,000 U.S. for a high-end journal in the sciences, is a very reasonable estimate of the actual costs of these journals, as they are produced at present in the U.S. This, naturally includes the need to produce both print and electronic, as well as the authentication control mechanisms that go with non-open access journals. The ICAAP amount covers more than just the software - which is free - it also covers technological support costs, conversion, etc. A higher cost rate to reflect editing costs might well be justified; let's look at some options. [SNIP] cheers, Heather Morrison
- Prev by Date: Swets Launches SwetsWise Linker
- Next by Date: RE: JISC Invitation to Tender: Open Access Publishing Initiative Round 2
- Previous by thread: Swets Launches SwetsWise Linker
- Next by thread: Camcording Films a Felony & protecting children
- Index(es):