[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: JISC Invitation to Tender: Open Access Publishing Initiative Round 2
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>, <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: JISC Invitation to Tender: Open Access Publishing Initiative Round 2
- From: "David Goodman" <David.Goodman@liu.edu>
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:45:47 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I'm surprised and pleased to find in the detailed proposal that: > 9. This Invitation to Tender is open to both UK and international > publishers. Proposals from publishers based outside the UK will need to > demonstrate that UK > authors are published in the relevant journals. > ... This shows a commendably non-chauvanist position, well befitting the UK's self-confidence from its long history as a center for scholarly publishing. It provides an appropriate challenge for other publishing counties, like the United States. International reciprocity is an obvious way of dealing with internationally-based science. Allthough start-up funding does not provide a long-term solution, many publishers have stated that financially the first 2 years or so require capital for any new title or innovation until it has established its reputation. Consequently, initiatives suh as this may indeed be critical in attaining permanence Two questions for the sponsors: o How was the money spent in the first round? and, o From where and how did they obtain the funding? If we knew the arguments that persuaded the funders, others could try similarly. Dr. David Goodman Associate Professor Palmer School of Library and Information Science Long Island University dgoodman@liu.edu
- Prev by Date: Re: Springer blasts Open Choice criticism
- Next by Date: Re: Chronicle Article: John Ewing/American Math Society
- Previous by thread: John Ewing article in CHE
- Next by thread: Re: JISC Invitation to Tender: Open Access Publishing Initiative Round 2
- Index(es):