[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Chronicle Article: Creative Commons for Patents
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Chronicle Article: Creative Commons for Patents
- From: Liblicense-L Listowner <liblicen@pantheon.yale.edu>
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 01:41:37 -0400 (EDT)
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
This article was recommended by several liblicense-l readers. It can be found in the Chronicle of Higher Education, October 1, 2004, and: <http://chronicle.com/prm/weekly/v51/i06/06a03301.htm> Worth a detour. ___ Who Should Own Science? A group proposing alternative licenses says patents thwart research; some officials disagree By ANDREA L. FOSTER Creative Commons is a group that developed an alternative copyright system to make literature, music, films, and scholarship freely available to the public. Now it plans to do the same for scientific and technological research. The new project, called Science Commons, will encourage universities to voluntarily forgo some of the protections of patent and trade-secret laws in order to make scientific research more accessible to other universities, researchers, and the public through an alternative licensing scheme. One goal of Science Commons is to provide standard licenses on its Web site that universities can use to govern the distribution of their inventions. The idea follows the model of Creative Commons, which features several alternative copyright licenses on its Web site. Creative Commons draws its inspiration from the open-source-software movement, whose objective is to make software free so that anyone can improve the programs. Creative Commons and its new counterpart were founded by Lawrence Lessig, a cyberlaw expert and professor at the Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society, and other experts on law and technology. These developers say scientific progress is often stymied by universities and companies who hold on to research, preventing other scientists from gaining access to it. The developers are critical of the Bayh-Dole Act, a federal law adopted in 1980 that encourages the commercialization of inventions developed with federal money, and of efforts in Congress to give database publishers legal control over the information they collect. [MANY PARAGRAPHS DELETED] Copyright, Chronicle of Higher Education 2004 __
- Prev by Date: Chronicle Article: John Ewing/American Math Society
- Next by Date: Scheduled Downtime for Taylor & Francis Online
- Previous by thread: Chronicle Article: John Ewing/American Math Society
- Next by thread: Scheduled Downtime for Taylor & Francis Online
- Index(es):