[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: One library or many?
- To: "Liblicense" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: One library or many?
- From: "Sally Morris \(ALPSP\)" <chief-exec@alpsp.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 21:02:47 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
It would probably be unwise for content only to be stored in one place (whether this is the publisher, a deposit library or wherever) - more than one, using different technological approaches, makes sense as future-proofing/insurance. However, it's quite true that libraries don't all need to store e-content (and, indeed, they generally don't - this is a major source of savings, as identified in Schonfield et al's recent article). For material that is not in the public domain, however, libraries do need to obtain (and, where applicable, pay for) usage rights for their patrons, irrespective of where the content is stored. Sally Morris, Chief Executive Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers South House, The Street, Clapham, Worthing, West Sussex BN13 3UU, UK Phone: +44 (0)1903 871686 Fax: +44 (0)1903 871457 E-mail: chief-exec@alpsp.org ALPSP Website http://www.alpsp.org
- Prev by Date: RE: One library or many?
- Next by Date: RE: One library or many?
- Previous by thread: RE: One library or many?
- Next by thread: RE: One library or many?
- Index(es):