[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Open Access, journalism, & promoting the academy
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>, <heatherm@eln.bc.ca>, <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Open Access, journalism, & promoting the academy
- From: "David Goodman" <David.Goodman@liu.edu>
- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 23:20:21 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Dear Ms. Dittrich, What you say about medical journalism's role in disseminating information is of course correct; to a similar degree it is true of other sciences. Both publishers and research institutions have active press officers for the purpose, The natural desire of someone who has read an intriguing news item is to find out more about the subject, and thus it is particularly important that those articles with press coverage be available. Indeed, the Washington Principles themselves, minimal though some of us think them, say that the signatories "will continue to support the following forms of free access... Selected important articles of interest are free on line from the moment of publication." If you follow these principles, it would certainly include those articles to which you refer. I notice from your web site that you do make selected articles available, but only for one month from the current issue. If I interpret correctly, your present limitations do not really fit the meaning of "free on line from the moment of publication." I recognize your need for additional subscriptions. I do not see how restricting access to your journal will get them. Rather, making it more visible might. In my experience as a biomedical librarian, this is one of the relatively few journals that people do pick up and read, not just refer to for known articles. You are published for the Association of American Medical Colleges. The American medical schools, taken collectively, certainly have the funds to support your publication. Their general operating funds ultimately come from the public--from the government in the form of grant overhead and payments for patient care, and in considerable part directly from individuals and their insurors. If your organization considers your journal important--and well it should--it would seem to be a very suitable candidate for an Open Access journal. Yours, David Goodman, Ph.D Associate Professor Palmer School of Library and Information Science Long Island University dgoodman@liu.edu -------------------------------------------------------------------- Right now, we promote articles published in our (non-OA) journal, and make the full-text of the articles available to journalists. The text is also available to local media if they want it, and to the author's institution and its PR dept. if they ask for it. It is in our interest to promote articles we publish. We also direct media contacts both to our journal's editor and to the first author of articles of interest for interviews. We recently added an "In the News" button to our Web page to highlight coverage of our journal in various media. So, again, we are keenly interested in getting press coverage. Our journal, alas, isn't always the most press-worthy, but we are trying! I know some will bemoan the fact that we make articles free to the press that we do NOT make free to the average reader. I won't get into that wrangle here except to say that we are a small society journal that (1) gives most of its press run free to members and (2) has operated in the red for its entire existence. Two of my goals as managing editor are to increase readership and to, as much as possible, increase revenue to offset the association's expenses. Lisa Dittrich Managing Editor Academic Medicine Washington,D.C. 20037 lrdittrich@aamc.org (e-mail)
- Prev by Date: NIH proposal
- Next by Date: Re: AAP/PSP Open letter to Dr. Zerhouni (NIH)
- Previous by thread: RE: Open Access, journalism, & promoting the academy
- Next by thread: Aspect of peer review
- Index(es):