[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Economist article
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Economist article
- From: "Joseph J. Esposito" <espositoj@worldnet.att.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 21:48:40 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
>This is a nice case of a mainstream newspaper reporting an interesting >scientific puzzle for lay readers. JE: I love the Economist and I think it's great that it can link to an Open Access archive for further elucidation, but, please, let's not kid ourselves and call the Economist mainstream or the urge to know more about a topic a widespread phenomenon. This is elite media. OA of research materials, if and when it happens, is still going to be of interest only to a narrow sliver of the population. The door swings one way: you can democratize research publications (maybe), but you can't put the demos into the academy. Now, as for Survivor and Hilary Duff . . . . Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: Aspect of peer review
- Next by Date: AAP/PSP Open letter to Dr. Zerhouni (NIH)
- Previous by thread: Aspect of peer review
- Next by thread: RE: Economist article
- Index(es):