[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OA and the disciplinary differential
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: OA and the disciplinary differential
- From: Thomas Krichel <krichel@openlib.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 21:42:36 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
heatherm@eln.bc.ca writes > It is my totally subjective and admittedly biased viewpoint that, of the > sub-areas in the displine of my undergrad major, psychology, cognitive > science has been advancing at a tremendous rate. Is it possible that > the work of Stevan Harnad and his colleagues in developing Cogprints > http:// cogprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/, is a factor here? No, because it is too small. There are only three major discipline based OA archival systems around, in alphabethical order arXiv CiteSeer RePEc Each of these differs from the other in numerous ways. Cheers, Thomas Krichel mailto:krichel@openlib.org visiting CO PAH, Novosibirsk http://openlib.org/home/krichel RePEc:per:1965-06-05:thomas_krichel
- Prev by Date: Re: The Green and Gold Roads to Open Access
- Next by Date: Re: From an Interview with Dr. Zerhouni about Open Access, Productivity,& Accounting of Research Results
- Previous by thread: OA and the disciplinary differential
- Next by thread: Re: OA and the disciplinary differential
- Index(es):