[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
- Subject: Re: Central versus institutional self-archiving
- From: Fytton Rowland <J.F.Rowland@lboro.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 20:02:27 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
In a study in the UK which we have just completed for the Joint Information Systems Committee, JISC (a brief account of which will, referees permitting, be published in a forthcoming special issue of Serials Review), after quite exhaustive review of all aspects of e-prints archiving, we recommended a "harvesting model", in which full texts (and other digital objects) remain at distributed institutional (and other) archives, but metadata is harvested and processed centrally. This model seemed to overcome most of the drawbacks of a distributed model mentioned by Richard Durbin. http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/3904.html Fytton Rowland, Loughborough University, UK
- Prev by Date: Forthcoming SAGE Full-Text Collections
- Next by Date: OA a great boon to rural and poorer communities?
- Previous by thread: Forthcoming SAGE Full-Text Collections
- Next by thread: OA a great boon to rural and poorer communities?
- Index(es):