[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Expert warns website cancer therapies put lives at risk
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Expert warns website cancer therapies put lives at risk
- From: Liblicense-L Listowner <liblicen@pantheon.yale.edu>
- Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 18:52:04 -0400 (EDT)
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Reproduced from the Society for Scholarly Publishing list, of possible interest. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 13:56:53 -0400 From: "Hamaker, Chuck" <cahamake@email.uncc.edu> To: ssp@lists.sspnet.org Subject: [SSP-L] Expert warns website cancer therapies put lives at risk http://news.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=887992004 The Scotsman By HILARY MARSHALL * Scientific study reveals a number of websites are promoting treatments with no evidence of curative or preventive powers * The country's only professor of complementary medicine fears patients are putting their lives at risk by following advice to shun conventional treatments * Some patients have died after using certain 'remedies' THOUSANDS of cancer patients could be putting their lives at risk by using advice from websites promoting alternative therapies, new research has found. A scientific study identified 32 cancer-treatment websites that attracted tens of thousands of "hits" every day. But not one of the numerous treatments and approaches they advocated could be shown to cure or prevent cancer. In 3 per cent of cases, the sites actively discouraged patients from using conventional treatments, and 16 per cent did the same indirectly through the information they provided. Three sites - heall.comand healthy.netbased in theUnited States, and worldwidehealthcenter.netbased in theUKandCyprus, were judged to offer advice that was potentially harmful to patients. Professor Edzard Ernst, from the University of Exeter, who co-led the study, said: "This was to us quite an eye-opener and pretty scary stuff. "Our conclusion was that a significant proportion of these websites are actually a risk to cancer patients. We found that between these 30-odd sites, 118 different cancer 'cures' were recommended, complementary treatment which claimed to be able to cure cancer. None of these 118 can be demonstrated to cure cancer." The citation for the research article the newspaper refers to is: K. Schmidt and E. Ernst Assessing websites on complementary and alternative medicine for cancer Ann Oncol 2004 15: 733-742. Chuck Hamaker Associate University Librarian Collections and Technical Services Atkins Library University of North Carolina Charlotte Charlotte, NC 28223 phone 704 687-2825
- Prev by Date: The Economist on OA
- Next by Date: "Establishing an Institutional Repository"
- Previous by thread: The Economist on OA
- Next by thread: Patients heal themselves online
- Index(es):