[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Estimates of Conventional Journals, OA, and Repositories?
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Estimates of Conventional Journals, OA, and Repositories?
- From: "David Davis" <ddavis@copyright.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 18:15:18 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
David Goodman's recent presentation at SLA put the question of scholarly publishing futures into the context of 'relative use', as among Conventional Journals, OA Journals, and Institutional Repositories. This sounds about right to me. Those are indeed the trend lines to watch. Yet 'relative use' seems like a difficult metric to assess in detail. (Alternatively, I'm just overlooking something obvious; that happens, too. ;-) Does anyone have (or have a reference to) hard estimates of the current totals for Conventional Journals, OA Journals, and Institutional Repositories? If so, please post to the list. Thanks. Dave Davis ddavis@copyright.com
- Prev by Date: Journals, society activities and the zero-sum game (RE: Thoughts on the House of Commons report (Chesler)
- Next by Date: Re: The UK report, press coverage, and the Green and Gold Roads toOpen Access
- Previous by thread: Journals, society activities and the zero-sum game (RE: Thoughts on the House of Commons report (Chesler)
- Next by thread: Re: Estimates of Conventional Journals, OA, and Repositories?
- Index(es):