[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Self-archiving or third-party archiving? (RE: Authors and OA)
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Self-archiving or third-party archiving? (RE: Authors and OA)
- From: J.F.Rowland@lboro.ac.uk
- Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 19:10:43 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I agree with Norbert. Where an author is employed by (or a student at) a University, most of the 'green' publishers accept that the use of that University's Institutional Repository is 'self-archiving'. Issues may arise for publishers, however, if a subject-based repository is used (except in physics, where the physics specialist publishers are comfortable with arXiv). The question of authors unaffiliated with any institution is under discussion; in the UK it has recently been suggested that the British Library might provide an 'institutional repository' for such authors. Fytton Rowland, Loughborough University, UK. Quoting Norbert Lossau <lossau@ub.uni-bielefeld.de>: > Self-archiving in the narrow sense as described by Rick sounds to me > like "private" archiving. But is there private archiving for "public" > researchers? Self-archiving of a researcher at the university means in > fact archiving on a computer resource provided by the university (at > least in Germany). And the research has also been funded with public > grants (obviously there is private funding as well but let's keep this > aside for a moment). > > Thus why not interpreting institutional archiving as "self-archiving"? > The concept behind self-archiving is to have full control over the > content and this is certainly the case with all types of author and > faculty/institutional archiving. How institutions implement this policy > should be left to them. In Bielefeld we will continuously further > develop the current institutional repository to a full eScholarship > repository, hosted by the university library. This will not only > guarantee the full control but also the use of standards (like OAI-PMH) > and the library is willing to support this process actively. At our > university the library is not regarded as third party (on the same level > as a publisher) but as member of the same institution and as trusted > repository. > > Norbert Lossau
- Prev by Date: [no subject]
- Next by Date: Thoughts on the House of Commons report (long)
- Previous by thread: Re: Self-archiving or third-party archiving? (RE: Authors and OA)
- Next by thread: RE: Self-archiving or third-party archiving? (RE: Authors and OA)
- Index(es):