[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: OA and copyright -- Andy Gass quote in LJ News Wire
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: OA and copyright -- Andy Gass quote in LJ News Wire
- From: "Pennington, Buddy D." <penningtonb@umkc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 14:35:04 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
This is a very good point, Rick. I think many OA advocates do tend to generalize and state that OA content should be completely accessible and completely free for use. However, there is a real need for research content to be protected from manipulation, which the commercial publishers keep bringing up as a reason why we should all stick to the traditional model. I don't think Gass is throwing copyright out the window. I think he is simply trying to point out a reprioritization (is that a word!?) of values that open access brings up. Commercial publishing places protecting the content first and making it accessible second. Open access switches those, placing content protection behind the need to make it as accessible as possible. I don't think the elimination of copyright follows. Buddy Pennington Serials Acquisitions Librarian Miller Nichols Library University of Missouri - Kansas City 800 E. 51st Street Kansas City, MO 64110 816-235-1548 816-333-5584 (fax) penningtonb@umkc.edu
- Prev by Date: RE: OA and copyright -- Andy Gass quote in LJ News Wire
- Next by Date: The Justice Department wants to sue you on behalf of the MUSIC industry etc.
- Previous by thread: RE: OA and copyright -- Andy Gass quote in LJ News Wire
- Next by thread: RE: OA and copyright -- Andy Gass quote in LJ News Wire
- Index(es):