[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Internet Pornography Law Blocked by U.S. High Court (Update2
- To: "Liblicense-L" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Internet Pornography Law Blocked by U.S. High Court (Update2
- From: "Hamaker, Chuck" <cahamake@email.uncc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 06:34:03 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Internet Pornography Law Blocked by U.S. High Court (Update2) http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news? June 29 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. Supreme Court, citing free- speech concerns, blocked a federal criminal law that would bar commercial Web sites from making pornography available to children.=20 The justices, voting 5-4, said the law may unduly restrict access by adults to material that is sexually suggestive, yet constitutionally protected. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy said an alternate approach, blocking and filtering software, may be a more effective way to restrict youth access to online smut. ... The 1998 Child Online Protection Act, which has never been enforced, would require commercial Web site operators who display pornography to screen out children by requiring a credit card number or adult access code. Violators would face up to six months in jail. The law was challenged by the ACLU, Salon Media Group Inc., the Philadelphia Gay News and other organizations. Those groups say the measure would have a chilling effect on speech by creating a risk of a jail term even for putting non-obscene material online, such as information on obstetrics and gynecology, information on sales of books and photos and discussions about homosexuality. ... "Speakers may self-censor rather than risk the perils of trial,'' Kennedy's opinion said. ``There is a potential for extraordinary harm and a serious chill upon protected speech.'' Joining his opinion were Justices John Paul Stevens, David H. Souter, Clarence Thomas and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. .. Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist and Justices Sandra Day O'Connor, Antonin Scalia and Stephen G. Breyer dissented, saying the law is constitutional. The Bush administration defended the statute in court, saying such alternatives as filtering software had proven ineffective in shielding children from pornography. ... The case is Ashcroft v. ACLU, 03-218.=20 Chuck Hamaker Associate University Librarian Collections and Technical Services Atkins Library University of North Carolina Charlotte Charlotte, NC 28223 phone 704 687-2825
- Prev by Date: Re: Wellcome Trust report
- Next by Date: Copyright Clearance Center and OCLC
- Previous by thread: Re: Wellcome Trust report
- Next by thread: Copyright Clearance Center and OCLC
- Index(es):