[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Wellcome Trust report
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>, <margaret.landesman@library.utah.edu>
- Subject: RE: Wellcome Trust report
- From: "David Goodman" <David.Goodman@liu.edu>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 18:49:10 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I too have been told this, with respect to many countries. But even for the developed countries, especially for back-up archival copies, we should carefully consider the practice of "transmit electronically but give to the end user in print." At some very low print run, it would be more economical to prepare only an electronic version, and print the necessary number from that on a high speed laser printer. (I first became aware of this 20 years ago, when Pergamon supplied a long back run of a serial as print-out from microfilm. If they had said so I would have just gotten microfilm, as the print quality was much lower than it would be today). This would eliminate the fixed costs of the print version. The print version would lose high quality in the halftones, and color in color ilustrations; for many journals this would not matter; for those that did, the print quality from laser printers is better each year, and the quality and price of color printers is showing a similar improvement. There are a few areas where we can rely on technical improvements for cost savings (storage comes to mind). In these few but fortunate cases we should take advantage of it. Dr. David Goodman dgoodman@liu.edu -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu on behalf of Liblicense-L Sent: Sat 6/12/2004 10:56 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: Wellcome Trust report Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 10:29:34 -0600 From: Margaret Landesman <margaret.landesman@library.utah.edu> Subject: Re: Wellcome Trust report -------------- My colleague has been working in Ethiopian academic libraries and her Ethiopian colleague spent six months here. They came to the opposite conclusion - electronic works better for them. The Ethiopian libraries have very few computers and intermittent online access. But they know that they can queue requests and print them when the system is up, even if that's once a week. (Their most urgent need = is for a generator so as to avoid several hours a day without electricity altogether.) But the postal system is so insecure and unreliable that they hand carry books for ILL library to library. And felt that even if they had any acquisitions money - which they don't, they rely on gift materials - it wouldn't work to subscribe because the paper copy just never arrives. I think we need to distinguish between: 1) electronic as a medium for the end user and 2) electronic as a way of transmitting texts In many cases, a mixed model may be best - in this one, transmit electronically but give to the end user in print. Margaret Landesman University of Utah
- Prev by Date: [no subject]
- Next by Date: Re: Wellcome Trust report
- Previous by thread: RE: Wellcome Trust report
- Next by thread: Re: Wellcome Trust report
- Index(es):