[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Wellcome Trust report
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Wellcome Trust report
- From: "Sally Morris \(ALPSP\)" <chief-exec@alpsp.org>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 19:14:15 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
The answer to Fred's question is very simple. The reason we have not seen lots of publishers dropping their prices by 20-25% is that their customers have not yet allowed them to drop the print versions. When all our customers are happy to move to electronic-only (given the two main obstacles, archiving and VAT) then I am sure publishers will make the move It's not a matter of the particular customer dropping their print copies, as Fred suggests, but rather of the print edition being abandoned altogether - the costs don't fully go away until you do that. I think a price reduction of 5-10% for customers who decline the print edition of a journal available in both formats is quite common. Sally Sally Morris, Chief Executive Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers E-mail: chief-exec@alpsp.org ----- Original Message ----- From: ""FrederickFriend"" <ucylfjf@ucl.ac.uk> To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 6:30 AM Subject: Re: Wellcome Trust report > A simple question: if, as Sally says "most of the saving would be due to a > move to on-line only", why have publishers not offered libraries a 30% > discount or even a 25% discount if they dropped print? Is it because of > the difference Sally points to between cost and price - i.e. the > publisher's price is not being lowered to reflect the savings in cost by > going on-line? > > Fred Friend
- Prev by Date: RE: PNAS Introduces Open Access Publishing Option
- Next by Date: Monopolies and copyright (RE: Wellcome Trust report)
- Previous by thread: Re: Wellcome Trust report
- Next by thread: Re: Wellcome Trust report
- Index(es):