[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: PNAS Introduces Open Access Publishing Option
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: PNAS Introduces Open Access Publishing Option
- From: "David Goodman" <David.Goodman@liu.edu>
- Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 00:05:39 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Sally, Another certain cost savings is the savings to both libraries and publishers of the need to maintain access control system, subscription departments, and so on. For a library, the savings will be small when it applies to only a few journals; it would be much larger if it were universal. The number of staff in a typical large library handling electronic access and journal subscriptions may be in the range 5 to 10; some would still be needed for non-electronic material. A typical agent's fee for scientific periodicals has been in the range of 3 to 6 percent. I thus estimate the library-side savings at 5%. For a publisher, it would be very small unless all its publications were OA. Publishers have often added a 10% or 15% "platform fee" for electronic access, and paper distribution is usually figured to be between 2 and 3 times as expensive as electronic. (See Fred Friend's posting of this date). I have been estimating a total of 10% savings on the publisher side, but would be glad of a more exact estimate from those more knowledgeable. There is also the possible savings if competition for authors brings all publishers to the efficiency of the American Physical Society, at about $1500 an article. I don't attempt now to estimate this, because it's much more speculative. Yes, these are not very large savings. Very large savings are not to be looked for from OA journals. Other forms of OA may have significantly lower cost. The argument for OA journals is not cost alone, but the superior and more equitable access, combined with modest cost savings. I think, Sally, that you agree with that conclusion? Dr. David Goodman dgoodman@liu.edu -----Original Message----- [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Sally Morris Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 12:21 AM Subject: Re: PNAS Introduces Open Access Publishing Option David, where is your evidence that we can 'reduce the costs significantly'? Electronic-only makes a saving; efficiencies (as with the APS) can make some further savings. But other than that? Sally Morris, Chief Executive
- Prev by Date: DOAJ phase 2 - press release
- Next by Date: Re: Impact Factor, Open Access & Other Statistics-Based Quality
- Previous by thread: Re: PNAS Introduces Open Access Publishing Option
- Next by thread: RE: PNAS Introduces Open Access Publishing Option
- Index(es):