[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Reed Elsevier as "Green" publisher
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Reed Elsevier as "Green" publisher
- From: "David Goodman" <David.Goodman@liu.edu>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 00:54:00 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
What is needed Joe, is 100%. Any research library would want to maintain a subscription to what its patrons think important until there is OA to essentially 100% of the literature in a field, and good automatic links for getting at it from citations to the conventional version. The only field where this is anywhere near the case, is high energy physics, which is a very concentrated subject collected by a very small number of libraries, covered almost totally by a handful of journals, and possessing an excellent arXiv. In that subject, reports are that there have been very few cancellations of at least the journals from the American Physical Society. I can think of many reasons why this area might be exceptional; to find out, we shall have to wait until other areas reach the same point. For areas in which, say, 95% of the literature becomes OA, there is a possibility of cancellation by those libraries where the interest is peripheral. However, if the journals were expensive and peripheral, the odds are they would have been cancelled long ago. No one can be sure how the availability of OA, and self-archiving in particular, will affect the rest of the system. For example, Stevan Harnad has said that he thinks it will not necessarily harm the journals; I myself feel otherwise, that once OA becomes a full success, there may be little need for journals in the conventional sense, but only as overlay journals to the repositories, serving a quality-control and editing function. (By overlay journal I mean a web-published list of links to those articles in the repositories submitted to the journal, and meet its standards for scientific merit and technical quality. Some blogs seem capable of that function; they suffer because many of the items that they would want to link to are not OA.) We shall see. The key step is to convince all the scientists and other scholars to publish in such a manner that their material will be open, either in repositories or OA journals. I, personally, expect that we shall see within a few years. Dr. David Goodman dgoodman@liu.edu -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu on behalf of Joseph J. Esposito Sent: Mon 5/31/2004 1:08 AM 1. Does anyone know of any library cancellations of journals because of the availability of some or all of the articles in such journals in self- or institutional archives? ... 2. Assuming cancellations because of self-archiving are negligible or nonexistent, at what point, if ever, would one expect such cancellations to begin? Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: Re: Random thoughts on scholarly communication
- Next by Date: Re: Random thoughts on scholarly communication
- Previous by thread: Re: Reed Elsevier as "Green" publisher
- Next by thread: RE: Impact Factor, Open Access & Other Statistics-Based Quality Models
- Index(es):