[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A COUNTER concern.
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: A COUNTER concern.
- From: Thomas Krichel <krichel@openlib.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 15:30:19 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Jan Velterop writes > COUNTER is also not very satisfactory for open access journals. The > best it can provide is the MINIMUM number of downloads an article > has had. This is because open access articles are available from a > multitude of servers and repositories, and not only from the > publisher's own site (which is the only one COUNTER counts, > presumably). If your articles are available on multiple servers, you should work with the providers of such servers to unite the usage data. The RePEc digital library does this with its LogEc service. It combines the logs from various RePEc user services. See http://logec.hhs.se. Cheers, Thomas Krichel mailto:krichel@openlib.org http://openlib.org/home/krichel RePEc:per:1965-06-05:thomas_krichel
- Prev by Date: Elsevier Gives Authors Green Light for Open Access Self-Archiving
- Next by Date: RE: Cost of Open Access Journals: Other Observations
- Previous by thread: RE: A COUNTER concern.
- Next by thread: PNAS Introduces Open Access Publishing Option
- Index(es):