[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cost of Open Access Journals: Other Observations
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Cost of Open Access Journals: Other Observations
- From: J.F.Rowland@lboro.ac.uk
- Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 20:27:20 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Quoting Michael Leach <leach@eps.harvard.edu>: [snip] > > On a practical level, each library will have to determine the types of > OA journals it can afford (I'm speaking here of the institutional > memberships that PLoS, IOP, BioMedCentral & others offer). [snip] I know I am in danger of becoming a bore on this topic, but I feel I must say it again.... Publication charges for OA journals need not and should not be seen as a *library* expense. The intention is that they be charged to (first preference) the research grant that funds the research reported in the paper or (second preference) the institution that employs the author ar at which the author is a research student. In my opinion the institution should charge them internally to the department where the research is carried out. Some are charging them to the library, but I think they are misguided in doing so. Regarding them as a library expense, as Leach does here, muddies the waters and hides the critical difference between opan access and toll access. Fytton Rowland, Loughborough University, UK.
- Prev by Date: Re: Impact Factor, Open Access & Other Statistics-Based Quality Models
- Next by Date: Re: Impact Factor, Open Access & Other Statistics-Based Quality
- Previous by thread: Cost of Open Access Journals: Other Observations
- Next by thread: Re: Cost of Open Access Journals: Other Observations
- Index(es):