[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: learned societies and open access
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: learned societies and open access
- From: "Fytton Rowland" <J.F.Rowland@lboro.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 15:41:15 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Jan Velterop wrote: "Any societies that are in principle in favour of going the open access route but find building the technological tools and platform daunting or costly, are cordially invited to take up contact with us with a view to sharing the tried and tested tools and platform of BioMed Central without the need for any investment up-front." I don't think this is the major problem for societies - after all, HighWire, Ingenta, etc., have been giving e-publishing technological assiatance to society publishers for years, and ALPSP is a mutual self-help organisation. The major problems are concerned with revenue, which is used for support of a society's other non-publishing activities. There is also a more fundamental point, especially for small societies. If their publications are available free of charge to all on the WWW, people who used to belong to the society in order to receive personal copies of (or more recently personal electronic access to) their journals may see no reason to belong to the society at all, thus putting its very existence in jeopardy. Fytton Rowland, Loughborough University, UK.
- Prev by Date: Re: Costs of open access publishing - the Wellcome Trust
- Next by Date: RE: PNAS Introduces Open Access Publishing Option
- Previous by thread: learned societies and open access
- Next by thread: A reply to Elsevier [Re: Usage Statistics for Web Editions
- Index(es):