[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
A COUNTER concern.
- To: "Liblicense-L" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: A COUNTER concern.
- From: "Hamaker, Chuck" <cahamake@email.uncc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 17:53:00 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
As electronic access becomes the dominant model for accessing information in many libraries we MUST be able to show administrators, faculty, legislatures, funding agencies, PROOF of the utility of the products we purchase or lease. IT is not intuitive that e-resources must be purchased. If we can't demonstrate utility, then administrators who think libraries are deep pits of money being siphoned off from the institution, may feel justified in reducing library support. The common cause of COUNTER is critical for publishers and vendors and libraries. It brings order out of what is almost chaos right now, and it helps define to external concerns what it is we are about. If it works ultimately we might be able to point to a single statistic showing overall activity in e-resources. Some COUNTER vendors/publishers also include, when you request a COUNTER report, additional reports that are not exactly COUNTER. I appreciate and use that alternative data. But it complicates creating standard reports (across multiple sources) when publishers and vendors do not provide the COUNTER report(s) as separate reports (rather than bundled with others) which in my experience is confusing for all concerned. However as this is a new developing international standard, I think this is a fairly natural stage of development. The promise of COUNTER is so great, that I'm not quite as concerned that ALL a vendor's /publishers products are not ALL compliant at this stage. I think the question is whether there is a commitment over time to make all products compliant. This is a new enough and welcome enough initiative to expect the bumps and hope for the good of all concerned, the road gets smoothed over time. In training staff to download the literally hundreds of statistical reports available right now to my library, (over 150 databases, multiple reports per database when stats are available) it helps to know which products a vendor has made COUNTER compliant and exactly how to get JUST the COUNTER stats by themselves. Otherwise we are back to manually formatting and adjusting and defining fields, writing instructions and procedures for each vendor separately. Or simply ignoring them! Those vendor specific reports can be helpful, but I should be able to ask for them separately rather than have them included when I want the COUNTER reports. It helps lessen the difficulties enormously. Chuck Hamaker Associate University Librarian Collections and Technical Services Atkins Library University of North Carolina Charlotte Charlotte, NC 28223 phone 704 687-2825
- Prev by Date: RE: Costs of open access publishing - the Wellcome Trust
- Next by Date: RE: A reply to Elsevier [Re: Usage Statistics for Web Editions
- Previous by thread: P.S.: RE: EMBO Journal / Archival access to paid-for content
- Next by thread: RE: A COUNTER concern.
- Index(es):