[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BioMed Central announce national Open Access agreement forFinland
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: BioMed Central announce national Open Access agreement forFinland
- From: Stevan Harnad <harnad@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 19:15:44 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> Finland is the first country to make a nationwide commitment to support > Open Access publishing with BioMed Central, it was announced today. All > universities, polytechnics and research institutes in Finland have become > BioMed Central members. The membership agreement covers the cost of > publication, in BioMed Central's 100+ Open Access journals, for all 25000 > publicly funded researchers and teachers in Finland. Open Access (OA) Journal Publishing is to be encouraged. BioMed Central is to be encouraged. "Memberships" in Biomed Central -- whether institutional or national -- are also timely (even though they resemble institutional site-licenses, even though it is not at all clear how an institution or country can commit itself in advance on behalf of its researchers to publish in a particular peer-reviewed journal or journals, or with a particular publisher or publishers, and even though it is not at all clear how a publisher or peer-reviewed journal can commit itself in advance to publishing articles from an institution, country or individual; and even though it is not clear how this sort of subscription-like membership arrangement could scale up once there are more OA publishers and OA journals for institutions or countries to agree to become members of). This is all well and good, for the sake of accelerating the growth of Open Access. But if an institutution or country wishes to help accelerate the growth of Open Access, then besides agreeing to become a "member" of some or all of the 1000 OA journals out of the total of 24,000 journals that exist (which will take care of OA for 5% of that institution's or country's annual research output) would it not also be sensible to agree to provide OA for the remaining 95% of its research output -- by self-archiving it? If Finland wishes "to become the first country to make a (nontrivial) nationwide commitment to Open Access" it should also commit itself to this: http://www.eprints.org/signup/sign.php Norway is coming close... Norway: Open Online Access to Research http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/3172.html http://opcit.eprints.org/feb19oa/hauge-norway.doc Stevan Harnad
- Prev by Date: Chuck's question
- Next by Date: RE: Who isn't being heard in the Open Access debate?
- Previous by thread: Chuck's question
- Next by thread: why doesn't the non-academic sector account for more subscriptions?
- Index(es):