[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Who isn't being heard in the Open Access debate?
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Who isn't being heard in the Open Access debate?
- From: Heather Morrison <heatherm@eln.bc.ca>
- Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 18:02:43 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Who is funding basic research? According to the NSF's February 2004 Infobrief, the largest percentage of basic research expenditures is from universities and colleges (55%), with the second largest percentage coming from industry (14.3%), followed closely by nonprofit-administered FFRDCs (whatever those are) at 12.5% and the federal government at 8.2%. Applied research and development, in contrast (and understandably) is funded primarily by industry. Details at: http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/infbrief/nsf04307/start.htm It seems commonsense that any industrial research that is available for publication (i.e. not considered a trade secret) should be able to fit with an open access model. That is, if an article coming from industrial basic research is submitted to a peer-reviewed scholarly journals for publication, the reasons for doing so are probably exactly the same for industrial as for academic researchers. my two bits, Heather Morrison
- Prev by Date: BioMed Central announce national Open Access agreement for Finland
- Next by Date: Usage Statistics for Web Editions Customers
- Previous by thread: RE: Who isn't being heard in the Open Access debate?
- Next by thread: RE: Who isn't being heard in the Open Access debate?
- Index(es):