[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: No stats for ScienceDirect Web Editions and Basic Access Licenses, or: COUNTER compliancy and usage statistics: for "Premium customers" only?
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: No stats for ScienceDirect Web Editions and Basic Access Licenses, or: COUNTER compliancy and usage statistics: for "Premium customers" only?
- From: "Lenares,Deborah A." <LENAREDA@airproducts.com>
- Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 22:46:31 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
We were not notified of this change, thank you for bringing it to the list. Hopefully this will clear up problems with linking to WE through Chemport, Ingenta, etc. Currently all links from Chemport and Ingenta only go to SD, so are users are prompted to purchase articles through SD for content they have available without a fee through our WE access. I have complained to our series of Elsevier reps (and to CAS, and to Ingenta) about this for years. Hopefully this will be an improvement. As you so aptly stated, usage statistics are critical also. Deborah Lenares Electronic Content Specialist Team Lead - Resource and End User Support Information and Library Services Air Products and Chemicals 7201 Hamilton Boulevard Allentown, PA 18195 610-481-6984 -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu kaemper@ub.uni-stuttgart.de Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 5:00 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: No stats for ScienceDirect Web Editions and Basic Access Licenses, or: COUNTER compliancy and usage statistics: for "Premium customers" only? Elsevier-ScienceDirect is listed in the 2004 Register of Vendors providing COUNTER-compliant Usage Reports. As Elsevier Science has announced the migration of SD Web Editions to the ScienceDirect platform with effect from May 15, cf. Information for ScienceDirect Web Editions Customers, From: "Menefee, Daviess (ELS)" <D.Menefee@elsevier.com>, To: <reedelscustomers@lists.cc.utexas.edu>, Sent: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 21:48:26 +0100 and the announcement "Web Editions is moving to ScienceDirect" on http://www.web-editions.com/, I wondered whether Elsevier would now finally be willing to provide usage statistics to all institutional customers for all their subscribed titles, not only to Licensees of the ScienceDirect Service and only for fully licensed titles -- a question particularly relevant to those academic libraries that only provide access to Web Editions and to customers that have chosen the ScienceDirect Limited Collection Option. Therefore I posed this as question to our regional Account manager at Elsevier, Mr Claus Grossmann, c.grossmann@elsevier.com. His answer (translated from German) of May 6, 2004 reads: "... Web Editions now as well as in future represent no self-contained product variant, but a gratuitous "Add on" to the subscribed print journals. The migration [of Web Editions] to ScienceDirect as it appears from the customer's viewpoint is still based on two different underlying platforms at Elsevier. This means that Usage Statistics will also in the future not be available [for Web Editions], but only for fully licensed Online Journals." It seems rather strange in view of the above mentioned offical Elsevier announcements about the migration of SD WE to the SD platform that Elsevier is still trying to maintain the fiction of two different underlying platforms when it comes to usage statistics. I accept that the implementation of statistics reporting tools for Web Editions would have been costly as long as it resided on a different, not fully developed platform, but that obstacle should have been removed by now. Interestingly, we did receive WE usage data from 2001/02 for our site after we had told the publisher that we would have to refuse renewal of any lapsed subscriptions unless they would provide the usage data we needed for our evaluation and decision making (the main library had cancelled all its Elsevier Science Subscriptions in 2002 in connection with a serials cancellation and redesign project - that meant evaluation of all journals, followed by highly selective renewals a year later). What at that time required a lot of manual intervention by service people from Elsevier (cudos to them!), should now become much easier to implement. With the migration of the SD WE to the ScienceDirect platform, it strikes me as short-sighted policy and not particularly customer friendly, that Elsevier Science continues to refuse access to usage statistics for Web Editions. Short-sighted because access statistics for Limited Collection Customers that covered also Web Editions titles outside of the fully licensed collection could potentially demonstrate high demand for some of those titles, especially in the form of turnaway statistics for content outside of the Web Edition's rolling 12 months backfile. I should add that another large commercial publisher falls in this category of vendors that refuse to provide usage statistics for all but "Premium access" customers, namely John Wiley with its Enhanced vs. Basic Access License - they continue to refuse Wiley Interscience usage statistics for single site (BAL) customers outside consortia even after they started charging 5% and now 10% over the list price for a combined print + online subscription (cf. the Admin Guide: "Comprehensive Usage statistics are a benefit provided to EAL customers.", i.e. only to sites that opt for unlimited, concurrent access to all titles in an institution's collection.) Again, in 2001 we were provided usage statistics for one year after we pressed Wiley hard for it (albeit in print form only so that we had to key in everything for ourselves...). So we know that the infrastructure is in place -- it has to be since there is a single platform only. It has always been my understanding that it should be a definitive requirement for COUNTER compliance that usage statistics must be available to all customers who request them. I could even accept a moderate service charge for this but consider it totally unacceptable if this service is reserved for consortia or premium customers only, and libraries that prefer to choose electronic access at the title level, are systematically denied access statistics. I am therefore highly concerned that we have now already two vendors who advertise themselves or their services as COUNTER compliant but refuse to provide statistics to all their customers. On the positive side, for Springer which until last year firmly refused to deliver usage statistics for Basic License Customers (online free with print), COUNTER compliant usage statistics is now available (for journals and book series, incl. Landolt-Boernstein!). Although they are not listed explicitely as a COUNTER compliant vendor, they offer COUNTER compliant usage statistics via their Host MetaPress which serves as the platform for the new SpringerLink. Since MetaPress is a multi-publisher platform, restrictions no longer apply - voila! As far as I know the availability of these statistics for all customers has not been advertised by Springer, but of course this is very welcome news. Bernd-Christoph Kaemper, Stuttgart University Library Bernd-Christoph K�mper Universit�tsbibliothek Stuttgart, Holzgartenstr. 16, 70174 Stuttgart - Fachreferat f�r Physik / Koordinierung elektronischer Ressourcen - Postanschrift: Postfach 104941, 70043 Stuttgart, Tel. ++49 711 121-3510, Fax -3502, E-Mail: kaemper@ub.uni-stuttgart.de
- Prev by Date: Re: questions regarding American Medical Association online access via user name/password
- Next by Date: Who isn't being heard in the Open Access debate?
- Previous by thread: No stats for ScienceDirect Web Editions and Basic Access Licenses, or: COUNTER compliancy and usage statistics: for "Premium customers" only?
- Next by thread: Who isn't being heard in the Open Access debate?
- Index(es):