[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Industrial use and library costs
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Industrial use and library costs
- From: Heather Morrison <heatherm@eln.bc.ca>
- Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 19:17:37 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
On 4-May-04, at 6:05 AM, David Goodman wrote: 4. If it is judged that commercial organizations will receive the use of OA journals at too low a rate, there are many solutions, including differential subscription charges for print--a very common practice differential rates for author/organization funded articles differential membership rates--another very common practice. Here are some ideas on how the corporate sector could contribute to an openly accessible scholarly literature: Voluntary contributions (donations) to fund open access publishing or archiving. Perhaps this could be most effective where entire industries stand to benefit from open access in a particular discipline. For example, the chemistry industry has been mentioned recently, with the American Chemical Society a major publisher. If these kinds of groups could get together to achieve open access, all would benefit. It should be quite easy for corporations to quickly achieve both direct savings - the total amount of the donations needed should be much less than what is paid for by subscription (open access requires no sales efforts, complex legal negotiations, or access control mechanisms, after all) - and indirect savings, through tax relief. To avoid the possibility of undue corporate influence on the research process, a blind approach, perhaps through a foundation, might be best. For the same reason, the total contribution of the corporate sector should be a low percentage, as it likely is now, so it would be best to approach the corporate sector as one of a number of funders. In order to minimize the potential of dropouts due to games theory like effects, this approach would probably work best as an endowment approach to facilitate initial start-up or change-over costs; an endowment rather than ongoing funding approach would also contribute to minimize corporate influence on research. Another approach to corporate funding for an overall open access system of scholarly literature would be a voluntary tax. Don't laugh! What I'd suggest is that corporations that apply for tax relief due to research and development costs should show either direct benefit to society (make the results of their R & D openly accessible), or, if they prefer not to do this, a voluntary contribution to open access scholarly publishing would be a requirement to deduct R & D costs. Again, I think the overall contribution of the corporate sector should be low, so this need not involve huge numbers. The advantage of this approach is that it should target fairly directly the corporations that would benefit the most from open access. In order to ensure that funds are used efficiently, I would propose a "flow-through" approach with every dollar received going as directly as possible to those who need to efficiently publish as many scientific articles as possible (research universities, non-profit scholarly societies, charitable foundations that fund research). Since this approach would be most effective at a global level, perhaps one of our governments could bring this forward to a future round of multilateral negotiations? Please note that I am not an expert on taxation... Yet another approach would be an extremely small tax on the corporate sector as a whole to fund open access publishing; I'm sure that a very tiny portion of the taxes currently paid would make a substantial difference, not only for the producers and publishers of open access scholarly articles, for also for the entire corporate sector as a whole, which would benefit greatly from open access. None of these approaches are mutually exclusive, of course. Perhaps voluntary contributions to get things started would allow time for governments and corporations to work out and implement the taxation and administrative details, which would result in ongoing funding a few years later. A personal viewpoint! cheers, Heather G. Morrison Project Coordinator BC Electronic Library Network ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Phone: 604-268-7001 Fax: 604-291-3023 Email: heatherm@eln.bc.ca Web: http://www.eln.bc.ca
- Prev by Date: copyright question
- Next by Date: Re: copyright question
- Previous by thread: RE: Industrial use and library costs
- Next by thread: 楽して稼ぐ!!しかも・・・
- Index(es):