[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: prediction: exponential increase in citations to open access articles
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: prediction: exponential increase in citations to open access articles
- From: Phil Davis <pmd8@cornell.edu>
- Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:39:54 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Re: Heather's Prediction "The impact of Open Access Journals: a citation study from Thomson ISI", released to liblicense on April 15th appears to be the only generalizable piece of research that we've seen so far (see excerpt of conclusions below). The study done by Steve Lawrence, "Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact". Nature 2001, v.411 n.6837, p.521 has been cited as evidence that online journals will be cited more than what he calls "off-line" journals; however those who cite it as evidence seem to miss the point that this study was limited to the study of computer science conference articles and may not be generalizable to other disciplines. Rather than starting with personal predictions, it might be more constructive to question why the ISI results seem to contradict Heather's Personal Predictions. To reduce the chatter on this list, I ask that those respondents who post frequently to the list at least read the report before responding. --Phil Davis The impact of Open Access Journals: a citation study from Thomson ISI http://www.isinet.com/media/presentrep/acropdf/impact-oa-journals.pdf Page 10. "In ISI's Editorial Development Department, we have witnessed the evaluation, and selection or rejection of thousands of journals. In many cases we have been deluged with eloquent letters from sincere supporters of a particular journal under evaluation. We are often told of an extremely wide and growing base of subscribers to a particular journal. *What we find, though, is that wide distribution does not necessarily result in higher citations*. Open Access journals certainly have the potential to garner an even greater readership. Except where technology does not permit, anyone in the world will have access to them. Yet how does this additional exposure affect the importance and influence of the journal, as measured by citations? *To date, no clear effect has been observed. Though there is some suggestion in aggregate of a slightly more rapid accumulation of citations, this effect is, so far, minimal. The wide distribution of these OA journals has not yet been shown to have any appreciable effect on their appearance in lists of cited references in other journals". .
- Prev by Date: RE: Does anyone have the data?
- Next by Date: Wellcome Trust report, FT article, on costs of scientific publishing
- Previous by thread: RE: Does anyone have the data?
- Next by thread: Wellcome Trust report, FT article, on costs of scientific publishing
- Index(es):