[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
prediction: exponential increase in citations to open access articles
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu, heatherm@eln.bc.ca
- Subject: prediction: exponential increase in citations to open access articles
- From: heatherm@eln.bc.ca
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 08:32:46 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Prediction: exponential increase in citations to open access articles For the consideration of liblicense readers, I would like to submit a prediction that there will be an exponential increase in citations to open access articles: slow increase at first, followed by a dramatic rise - likely with bumps - rising to a peak. My reasoning behind this prediction is basically that citations that readers can click through directly to fulltext via a URL are of more value to the reader than bibliographic-only citations, with retrieval being a separate process. Authors will tend to prefer clickable links, which are of course accessible to the greatest possible readership with open access articles. I believe we are already seeing this trend - for example, in liblicense messages over the past few years. Personally, I prefer to both read and cite articles that are clickable linkable. When an author cites an article in a journal that my local library cannot afford to purchase, I feel left out of the conversation. Please note: I am not referring to my current employer - I have only recently joined the staff of a large academic university library, and am more familiar with the small to medium academic environment. What is beginning to emerge as a preference may at some point become an expectation. Individual perceptions may tend to shift from the clickable link as a nice extra positive to the non-clickable link as a negative. This may form one of the means of peer pressure that liblicense participants have mentioned would be necessary to drive a system requiring voluntary change. That it, I can see people asking authors at some point in time, "Is there a clickable link for that article?" and even "Why isn't there a clickable link- grrr!" Editors, at some point, will tend to see articles with clickable citations as more valuable to readers, and will tend to select these over articles with less accessible citations. Editors and peer reviewers alike may begin asking, "Is there a clickable link for that?" One of the reasons there will be some bumps along the way is that crossreferencing within subscription databases performs basically the same function - but only among the community of subscribers. If not every library can afford all the big deals, this system will only work partially even within the community of common subscribers - even for those with the largest collections, the open access article will still be the surest way to provide the article for the most possible readers. Of course, there would be no way to measure this prediction at the present time. It might be interesting to have a look at some numbers around 2011 or so...but I'll leave that to the citation analysis experts. Many thanks to Joseph Esposito for inspiring this train of thought... My personal opinion by, Heather Morrison Project Coordinator BC Electronic Library Network heatherm@eln.bc.ca 604-268-7001 Fax: 604-291-3023 WAC Bennett Library 8888 University Drive Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6
- Prev by Date: News Release: CrossRef(TM) Launches Pilot Program of CrossRefSearch, Powered By Google
- Next by Date: RE: Back to basics
- Previous by thread: News Release: CrossRef(TM) Launches Pilot Program of CrossRefSearch, Powered By Google
- Next by thread: Re: prediction: exponential increase in citations to open access articles
- Index(es):