[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Back to basics
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Back to basics
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 18:46:58 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> Would it not be logical if that one subscriber were the author's > institution (or the author's funding body)? Of course it wouldn't. What would be logical would be for the subscriber to be the person who wants access to the content. The problem is that the logical solution doesn't accord with our (librarians') desire to provide high-quality information to those who can't afford to buy it for themselves. That's why there are libraries -- so that institutions or communities can buy access to such information at wholesale cost and provide it to all of their constituents in return for a levy (in the form of tuition, fees and/or taxes) that amounts to a tiny percentage of the individual subscription cost. Voila -- tension between libraries and publishers. ---- Rick Anderson Dir. of Resource Acquisition University of Nevada, Reno Libraries (775) 784-6500 x273 rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: RE: Back to basics
- Next by Date: Publisher and Customer Advisory Boards Guide Swets in E-Journals Management Drive
- Previous by thread: RE: Back to basics
- Next by thread: Re: Back to basics
- Index(es):