[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reed Elsevier CEO comments
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Reed Elsevier CEO comments
- From: "Joseph J. Esposito" <espositoj@worldnet.att.net>
- Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:09:05 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Note: not *my* article. Please don't shoot the messenger. I don't believe there is any likelihood that Reed Elsevier will offer any significant Open Access options (unless one has a fairly specialized notion of OA). Joe Esposito ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Feinman" <RFeinman@downstate.edu> To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 9:27 AM Subject: Re: Reed Elsevier CEO comments > The Esposito article does not entirely mesh with comments I get from > librarians about Elsevier practices. But the problem is simple. > Elsevier, and everybody else, can offer OA online and also a paid > subscription. If the paid subscription option is so useful it will > survive. For example, I have always had access to Nature and Science > through our Institution but I still subscribe. No doubt Elsevier has > many journals like that. If not, money is being wasted. > > Richard D. Feinman > Alternate E-mail: rumford@onebox.com
- Prev by Date: Re: How to fund open access journals from available sources
- Next by Date: Re: Olbers' Paradox and OA
- Previous by thread: Re: Reed Elsevier CEO comments
- Next by thread: [no subject]
- Index(es):