[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Open access and impact factor
- To: "Liblicense-L@Lists. Yale. Edu" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Open access and impact factor
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:36:20 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> Rick Anderson's question is interesting even though it demonstrates some > attachment to the concept of an absolute scale of value. Actually, I'm more interested in impact factor as a relative measure; obviously, there's no way to really assess the absolute value of any particular article. > If this is correct, this shows that Nature acts as an impact > factor amplifier, independently of the intrinsic quality of the article > under consideration. No, because Nature actually has a reputation for publishing high-quality articles. So while it's true that publication in Nature is not an ironclad guarantee of high quality, it would be going too far to say that publication in Nature has nothing to do with quality. ------------- Rick Anderson Director of Resource Acquisition University of Nevada, Reno Libraries (775) 784-6500 x273 rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: Reply to Jan Velterop
- Next by Date: Re: Open access and impact factor
- Previous by thread: Re: Open access and impact factor
- Next by thread: Re: Open access and impact factor
- Index(es):