[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
EMBO Journal + EMBO Reports / expired access
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu, lis-e-journals@jiscmail.ac.uk
- Subject: EMBO Journal + EMBO Reports / expired access
- From: kaemper@ub.uni-stuttgart.de
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:22:54 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
[please excuse multiple receipt of this message] Dear list members, although Oxford University Press, the former publisher of EMBO Journal, assured us that the grace period at HighWire would be at least three months and although I communicated this to NPG and received no clear message that the grace period would end earlier, the grace period at HighWire apparently has ended on March 9. As far as I know there was no communication of that fact by NPG. On the HighWire website, for some time there was an entry "(to be determined)" in place of the usual back issues policy entry on the overview page of free back issues at HighWire. Only very recently, there was placed an entry "until March 8" under "free trial period", but it was not at all clear that this date would apply also to the grace period for former subscribers to EMBO Journal. As many of you are aware, the changes in pricing policy for the EMBO Journal were announced very late in 2003; to make things worse, no pricing table was provided to agencies, but each agency or subscriber had to obtain an individual quote for each customer. As a result, even today a number of institutions are still without a quote. As expected NPG also did not manage to add the EMBO package to all institutional accounts (e.g. those within our GASCO EMBO Consortium). No wonder that agencies and the NPG office itself is now flooded by complaints from libraries that have lost access to EMBO journal. I also find it irresponsible that until today I have received no answer from either the publisher or the society to the question about permanent access to paid content for this journal which was guaranteed as long as the journal was published by OUP but is now in the limbo as NPG's standard institutional site license does not acknowledge such archival rights, cf. my message to liblicense-l and lis-e-journals of Feb 18, 2004 (Fwd: RE: EMBO Journal / Archival access to paid-for content). It now has happened what was to be expected: former subscribers no longer have access to content of 2003 they paid for. OUP supports the guidelines from ALPSP ('When a society journal changes publisher', www.alpsp.org/socjourn1.pdf) and told us that the issue of archival access to paid-for content ('perpetual access') in respect of The EMBO Journal was highlighted during the hand-over discussions between OUP and NPG, but NPG and EMBO do not seem to care. I would suggest that NPG should consider to extend the grace period as originally planned (until end of March) and also should comment on how they plan to give back access to paid issues of 2003 for all former subscribers (the easiest way would be to temporarily switch the free back issues policy to the same mode as for EMBO reports i.e. to make 2003 open access completely, and reinstate the 12 months moving wall from 2005 on). In my view, there are many lessons to learn from this transition, which was a nightmare in many aspects and we should certainly discuss these at the next library advisory board meeting in New York in April. Best regards, Bernd-Christoph Kaemper, GASCO Nature Consortium -- Bernd-Christoph Kaemper, Dipl.-Physiker, Bibl.-Rat Fachreferent f�r Physik und Koordination elektronischer Ressourcen Universit�tsbibliothek Stuttgart, Postfach 104941, 70043 Stuttgart Tel +49 711 121-3510, Fax +49 711 121-3502, kaemper@ub.uni-stuttgart.de
- Prev by Date: RE: Open access and impact factor
- Next by Date: RE: Reuters article and Jan Velterop's comment
- Previous by thread: Industry leader posting record sales and earnings is on fire vd
- Next by thread: RE: Reuters article and Jan Velterop's comment
- Index(es):