[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reuters article
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Reuters article
- From: Ann Okerson <ann.okerson@yale.edu>
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:29:53 -0500 (EST)
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Forwarded at the request of Margaret Landesman, University of Utah Library. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 08:41:01 -0700 From: Margaret Landesman <margaret.landesman@library.utah.edu> To: ann.okerson@yale.edu Subject: FW: Reuters article Jan: Perhaps not a stewpot for the sciences. But there are other (more interesting) fields, like the social sciences. And the arts, and for them, I would guess it is the stewpot. I was especially taken by the piece on WebFountain below and its 'hubs and authorities upended' bit, http://news.com.com/2100-1032_3-5153627.html Margaret Landesman Head, Collection Development University of Utah -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 3:40 PM To: 'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu' Subject: RE: Reuters article Joe Esposito wrote: > user-generated content [...] the stewpot out of which open access > research publications will arise. Perhaps in the same way as the prestigious scientific journals arose out of the drivel found in the magazine racks of the average airport newsstand? Or more like the statistically significant effect of the decline of the stork population on the birth-rate of humans in Western Europe? Jan Velterop
- Prev by Date: Industry leader posting record sales and earnings is on fire vd
- Next by Date: RE: Open access and impact factor
- Previous by thread: RE: Reuters article
- Next by thread: Methodology for estimating cost per article at an institution
- Index(es):