[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Problem licenses
- To: "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu'" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Problem licenses
- From: "Hoffmann, Gretchen" <ghoffmann@fulbright.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 22:58:42 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
You might check out Liblicense: http://www.library.yale.edu/~llicense/index.shtml As I recall, they have examples of not-so-friendly language as well as good language, but I might misremember. Gretchen McCord Hoffmann Attorney at Law Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P. ghoffmann@fulbright.com 512-536-5668 -----Original Message----- From: Pennington, Buddy D. [mailto:penningtonb@umkc.edu] Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 8:22 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Problem licenses Hi all, A colleague of mine is developing a class on electronic resources and has asked me to provide her with an example of a "bad" license agreement. I'm pretty new at this and the ones I have dealt with have been pretty standard. Can any of you point to any license agreements that seem overly restrictive for libraries? Please post directly to me instead of the list. Thanks. Buddy Pennington penningtonb@umkc.edu
- Prev by Date: RE: Publishers' view/reply to David Prosser
- Next by Date: Re: Clarification on misquotation of figure from OSI Guide
- Previous by thread: Problem licenses
- Next by thread: Reuters article
- Index(es):